Norm Conflicts and Pandemic Preparation

New PRIF Working Paper by Una Jakob on Indonesia’s policy in the WHO Influenca Pandemic preparedness.

WHO-Flagge. Foto: U.S. Mission Photo/Flickr, Eric Bridiers | CC BY-ND 2.0 (bit.ly/34nNHUY)

WHO-Flagge. Foto: U.S. Mission Photo/Flickr, Eric Bridiers | CC BY-ND 2.0 (bit.ly/34nNHUY)

The current Covid-19 pandemic demon­strates the great importance of inter­national cooperation in the prevention and contain­ment of global disease outbreaks. In the new PRIF Working Paper "Norm Conflicts in Global Health: The Case of Indone­sia and Pandemic Influenza Prepared­ness", Una Jakob traces the coope­ration in the "Pandemic Influenza Prepared­ness Framework" (PIP Framework) of the World Health Organi­zation (WHO). The framework was adopted in 2011 as a reform of decades of cooperation. Indonesia had previously dropped out of the previous network in 2007 because the country, like other members of the Global South, did not benefit ade­quately from the results of the research, even though they were an important supplier of virus samples. 

The new Framework estab­lished benefit-sharing and virus-sharing as principles on an equal footing. It thus reformed the WHO process but also brought to the fore existing tensions and conflicts between various norms and practices: global health coope­ration (which requires the sharing of pathogen samples), the protection of intel­lectual property rights (which is intended to promote inno­vation and ensure profits), and the protection of genetic resources (which considers pathogens as national resources and requires adequate benefit-sharing in their exploi­tation).

This Working Paper traces Indonesia’s policy regarding pandemic influenza prepared­ness and the reform process within WHO. Moreover, it presents the inter­linkages between said norm complexes, which are exacer­bated by techno­logical develop­ments in genetic sequencing, as areas that would merit further theoretical and empirical research.

Download the Working Paper here.