No Impunity for Chemical Warfare

PRIF Spotlight by Una Becker-Jakob about options for ending the use of chemical weapons

A Syrian man collects samples from the site of a suspected toxic gas attack in Khan Sheikhun in Syria. (Photo: dpa/ newscom)

A Syrian man collects samples from the site of a suspected toxic gas attack in Khan Sheikhun in Syria. (Photo: dpa/ newscom)

Not too long ago, it seemed that chem­ical war­fare was a thing of the past. In re­cent years, however, the world has been troubled by news of state and non-state actors’ use of chem­ical weapons in Syria, with the re­ported attack in Douma on 7 April 2018 being only the latest in a long series of similar ac­counts. Such use poses a chal­lenge to the uni­versal chem­ical weapons pro­hi­bition as long as the inter­national com­munity is un­able to agree on a unified and deter­mined re­sponse and to find ways of hold­ing the per­pe­trators to ac­count.

In PRIF Spotlight 3/2018 "No Impunity for Chemical Warfare. What Are the Options for Ending the Use of Chemical Weapons?", Una Becker-Jakob argues that this situation must be over­come if chem­ical war­fare is to be con­signed to history for good.

Download (pdf, 652kb): Becker-Jakob, Una (2018): No Impunity for Chemical Warfare. What Are the Options for Ending the Use of Chemical Weapons?, PRIF Spotlight 3/2018, Frankfurt/M.